Coordinate Governance

Scope and Contents Joint Board Retreat, 1999-2000 September 16-17, 1999 Joint Board Retreat Panel on Defining the Challenges for Liberal Arts Colleges Key Issues on the Panel Topics Where are CSB/SJU headed and what is the governing role of the Board in getting us there? Building the Foundation: Strategic Plan 2000-2003December 3, 1999 Benedictine Values and Tradition Report on Key Indicators Report from Joint Governance Committee Report on Coordinate Finance...

Scope and Contents Joint Board Retreat, September 18-19, 2003 Revised copy of Discussion on September 19-20, 2003 Topic: "Academic Vision: National Liberal Arts Market Positioning focusing on academic affairs activities and programs to achieve a more highly valued and valuable undergraduate Catholic liberal arts educational experience An Environmental Scanning of the Competitive Context of Higher Education (report by Henry Smorynski) Toward a More National Market Positioning and...

Scope and Contents

Joint Board Retreat, September 2002 Joint Board Retreat Small group discussions on the five key strategic planning aspirations (see Small Group Discussion Summary)

Scope and Contents

Joint Committee on Cooperation, 1987-1988

Presidential selection of the members of the Ad hoc Boards Committee on CSB/SJU Cooperation, January 5 and 7, 1987 Letter from CSB Chairman Herman Ratelle to the members of the new committee, January 10, 1987 stating the purpose of the Ad hoc Committee to assess cooperation and to present recommendations for a mandate to administrators concerning the future of cooperation "Notes of meeting on February 11, 1987

Scope and Contents Joint Governance, April 23, 2004 Approval of April 23, 2004 Report on the Coordinate Relationship Report on Strategic Issues and Directions Discussion on the Role of Boards and Committees in Strategic Direction [Motion to recommend approval of the "Coordinate Governance Structure" as an amendment of the December 8, 2000 to clarify the role of the Joint Governance Committee (approved at Joint Board meeting May 14, 2004). The amendment deals...

Scope and Contents

Joint Governance, August 28, 2000 August 28, 2000: Review Committee Responsibilities Report on Actions at BUC Report from Task Force on Liabilities Evaluation of Board and Committee Work, 1999-2000 Review Revised Coordinate Governance Documents Preview of Retreat Proposed 2000-2001 Agendas for the committee

Scope and Contents

Joint Governance Committee, March 19, 1992

March 19, 1992 Minutes: dealt with the chief obstacles to coordinate relations Draft of Mission Statements Summary of Obstacles On March 6, 1992 CSB Board meeting had approved the development of a Committee on Coordinate Relations and asked the CSB Chair to cooperate with the SJU Chair and the two presidents in its development (a copy of that decision is in the Joint Governance minutes of March 19, 1992 )

Scope and Contents Joint Governance Committee, 1972 to 1993-1994: Background information: The Committee was called the Joint Committee on Coordinate Relations until the end of 1995-1996. Since 1996-1997, the Committee has been called the Joint Governance Committee. The Governance Document of December 8, 2000 states that the Academic Affairs committee is a Joint Committee rather than a coordinate committee because the two Boards always meet together. "Joint Committees...

Scope and Contents

Joint Governance Committee, 1994-1995 September 14, 1994: Discussion of John Kendall's essay, "A Study of Two Cultures" Identification of Major Governance Tasks for next 2 years

October 12, 1994:

December 15, 1994: Discussion of "Boards that make a difference" March 23, 1995: Their Charge is to design the system by which CSB/SJU will govern the coordinate enterprise.

Scope and Contents Joint Governance Committee, 1998-1999 to 2001-2002: CSB-SJU Coordinate Relations 1998-1999: July 16, 1998 Approval of Minutes of April 8, 1998 Review of Responsibilities of the Committee Resolution to suspend the work of the Benedictine Tradition and Values Committee for the year Renamed CSB Membership to be Trusteeship Committee JGC agreed that appointment of task forces is at appropriate vehicle to serve needs that do not require a standing committee of the Board Evaluation of Board and...